South Carolina Case Displays Blatant Voter Suppression from Republicans

Her testimony on Tuesday and Wednesday bordered on the absurd at times. Not because Andino is a poor witness, not because she’s a zealot, but for precisely the opposite reason.

Relentlessly, professionally, candidly, she has revealed to the world the utter lack of sense behind the new law — the lack of foresight on the part of the legislators, the Tea Partyers, and the conservative radicals, who scrambled to enact the odious measure in the face of reasonable, bipartisan, biracial alternatives. Under cross-examination by Garrard Beeney, Andino has delivered a river of evidence proving that the state’s minorities — and its poor, and its ill — will effectively be disenfranchised by the new law.

Here, for example, is the transcript from Wednesday morning’s session of the federal court trial now underway before three (largely baffled) judges. Take a few moments to read for yourself how unprepared South Carolina is to ensure, come November, that registered voters — men and women who have voted without incident before — will have their votes counted this election season. Below is my favorite passage from the morning session — but first here is a little bit of background for it.

Rest of the article here

Advertisements

One thought on “South Carolina Case Displays Blatant Voter Suppression from Republicans

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s